Crypto Wallets

img Why you should trust us?

Our crypto wallet reviews compare custody, security, supported assets, recovery, pricing and usability using available product information and primary sources. Each review explains its scope, evidence and practical trade-offs.

When you buy through affiliate links in our content, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn how our funding model works. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Best Crypto Wallets — Ranked

1st place
Ledger Wallet Review
Best hardware wallet
8.8/10 Very Good
Key feature
Secure Element chip
Key Advantages
  • CC EAL6+ Secure Element on 4 of 5 models
  • 500+ coins in Ledger Wallet, thousands via third-party wallets
  • Bluetooth on 4 of 5 models, USB on all
2
Trezor Wallet Review
Best open-source
8.6/10 Very Good
Key feature
Open-source firmware
Key Advantages
  • Open-source firmware and Trezor Suite
  • EAL6+ Secure Element on all three models
  • Three models from €59 to €249
3
MetaMask Wallet Review
Best for dApps and DeFi
8.5/10 Very Good
Key feature
Free self-custodial wallet
Key Advantages
  • Native Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin and Tron support
  • Added Protection and Blockaid-powered alerts built in
  • Works with Ledger, Trezor and Keystone hardware wallets

Compare the Top Crypto Wallets

WalletKey FeaturePriceCustody TypeNetworksCoinsFounded
Secure Element chipFrom €49 / $59Self-custody (non-custodial)BTC, ETH, SOL + 100+ chains500+ native, thousands via third-party wallets2014 Visit
Open-source firmwareFrom $59Self-custody (non-custodial)BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP + thousands of tokensThousands of coins and tokens2013 Visit
Free self-custodial walletFreeSelf-custody (non-custodial)Ethereum and EVM networks, Solana, Bitcoin, TronETH and ERC-20 tokens, NFTs, plus BTC, SOL and TRX2016 Visit

The Best Crypto Wallets in More Detail

Ledger Wallet Review

Rank 1
Overall Score 8.8 Very Good
Wallet Profile
Key feature Secure Element chip
Supported Coins 500+ native, thousands via third-party wallets
Networks BTC, ETH, SOL + 100+ chains
Custody Type Self-custody (non-custodial)
Pros
  • Keys generated and stored in a certified Secure Element, signing confirmed on device
  • Ledger Wallet covers buying, swapping, staking and Ethereum/Polygon NFTs
  • Recovery Key card and Transaction Check on Stax, Flex and Nano Gen5; optional Ledger Recover
Cons
  • Low-level firmware is partly closed source
  • Optional Ledger Recover relies on three outside providers
  • 2026 app flaws (Monero, Ethereum, Zilliqa) needed app updates, not just firmware updates

Ledger is a Paris-based hardware wallet maker founded in 2014. Its five current signers (Stax, Flex, Nano Gen5, Nano X and Nano S Plus) keep private keys in a certified Secure Element and require physical confirmation on the device. The Ledger Wallet app handles coins, buying, swapping and staking. This review covers the lineup, the 2026 security disclosures, coin support, recovery options and costs.

Trezor Wallet Review

Rank 2
Overall Score 8.6 Very Good
Wallet Profile
Key feature Open-source firmware
Supported Coins Thousands of coins and tokens
Networks BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP + thousands of tokens
Custody Type Self-custody (non-custodial)
Pros
  • Firmware and Trezor Suite are open source, with public code since 2014
  • EAL6+ Secure Element on every current model, plus TROPIC01 on the Safe 7
  • PIN of up to 50 digits, passphrase and Multi-share Backup on every model
Cons
  • Secure element software is closed source (OPTIGA)
  • Lab attacks on the Safe 3 (2025) and Safe 7's TROPIC01 chip (2026)
  • Safe 3 and Safe 5 have limited iPhone support

Trezor is a hardware wallet maker founded in 2013 and part of the SatoshiLabs Group. Its three current models (Safe 3, Safe 5 and Safe 7) pair open-source firmware with an EAL6+ secure element and work with the Trezor Suite app. This review covers the lineup, the 2026 security disclosures, Trezor Suite, backup options, costs and how Trezor compares with Ledger.

MetaMask Wallet Review

Rank 3
Overall Score 8.5 Very Good
Wallet Profile MetaMask Wallet Review
Key feature Free self-custodial wallet
Supported Coins ETH and ERC-20 tokens, NFTs, plus BTC, SOL and TRX
Networks Ethereum and EVM networks, Solana, Bitcoin, Tron
Custody Type Self-custody (non-custodial)
Pros
  • Strong dApp compatibility across EVM networks, plus native Solana, Bitcoin and Tron
  • Built-in protections: Blockaid alerts, address poisoning detection, Added Protection
  • Hardware wallet support and optional Card, Money Account and Rewards
Cons
  • Hot wallet: phishing and malicious approvals are the main risk
  • 0.875% swap fee on top of network and pool fees
  • Infrastructure security incident disclosed on 30 September 2026

MetaMask is a free self-custodial wallet for browser and mobile, launched in 2016 and now rebranding from Consensys Software Inc. It covers Ethereum and EVM networks plus native Solana, Bitcoin and Tron, with built-in swaps, a self-custodial Mastercard debit card, Rewards and hardware wallet support. This review covers features, safety and the 30 September 2026 security incident, fees, the Card, Rewards and how MetaMask compares.

Compare our in-depth reviews of the two most established hardware wallet makers. The full breakdowns live on their own pages — the Ledger Wallet Review and the Trezor Wallet Review — and this page summarises the decision: what a hardware wallet is for, how the two brands differ, and what to check before you buy.

What Is a Crypto Hardware Wallet?

A crypto wallet is the tool that holds the private keys you need to spend your coins, and a hardware wallet is the version that keeps those keys offline. Your coins never actually live inside the device — they live on the blockchain as entries in a public ledger. What the wallet stores is the private key that proves you control a given address, and it is the private key that a thief actually wants. A hardware wallet keeps that key on a dedicated chip that stays disconnected from the internet, so it cannot be copied by malware running on your computer or phone.

The two brands our team indexed here are Ledger (rating 8.8) and Trezor (8.6), the two hardware wallet makers with the longest track records in the market. Ledger is a Paris-based maker founded in 2014 that has sold more than eight million devices; Trezor, part of the SatoshiLabs Group in the Czech Republic, released its first device in 2014 and is widely credited with inventing the category. Both are non-custodial: you, not the company, hold the recovery phrase that can rebuild your wallet, and neither company can spend or freeze your funds.

Hardware wallets are one point on a spectrum, not a universal answer. A software wallet on a clean device is cheaper and faster but shares its keys with the operating system. Keeping coins on an exchange means trusting the exchange to stay solvent and to honour withdrawals. A hardware wallet moves the risk from software to a physical object: you now have to protect a device and a written seed phrase against loss, theft and fire, and the trade-offs change with every model — see the comparison below.

How Hardware Wallets Work

The core idea is that the signing key never leaves the device. When you set a wallet up, the device generates a seed phrase — a list of words that is the human-readable form of your private key — and shows it once on the screen. You write it down and store it somewhere safe. Every transaction after that is signed inside the device’s secure chip, and only the finished signature is sent to the computer or phone, which broadcasts it to the network.

Two details matter more than most buyers realise. The first is the confirmation step: a hardware wallet shows the destination address and amount on its own screen, so even a compromised computer cannot silently rewrite where the money goes — it can only ask you to approve the wrong thing, which is why reading the screen before every confirmation is the habit that stops most attacks. The second is the seed phrase itself. Anyone who obtains those words can rebuild the wallet on another device and empty it, without ever touching your hardware. That makes the paper or metal backup the real target, not the device.

Both brands here use a certified Secure Element to hold keys: a chip designed to resist physical extraction and rated CC EAL6+ on most current models (Ledger’s Nano X uses the older CC EAL5+ rating). Trezor pairs its EAL6+ chip with fully open-source firmware, while Ledger publishes its companion app and device apps openly but keeps low-level firmware partly closed. The practical difference is auditability versus a tighter hardware boundary — a trade-off we score separately rather than declaring one approach categorically better.

Ledger vs Trezor Compared

The short version: Ledger has the wider model range and deeper coin support inside its own app, while Trezor leans on open-source firmware and a simpler three-model line-up. The table sets out the two line-ups as recorded in our fact bank; prices are the late-September 2026 figures from each maker’s shop and change with region, taxes and promotions.

WalletRatingCurrent modelsSecure ElementFirmwarePrice range
Ledger8.8Stax, Flex, Nano Gen5, Nano X, Nano S PlusCC EAL6+ (EAL5+ on Nano X)Partly closed€49 to €399
Trezor8.6Safe 3, Safe 5, Safe 7EAL6+ OPTIGA Trust M (Safe 7 adds a second chip)Open source€59 to €249

Ledger’s line-up. Five current signers split into two groups: the touchscreen Stax, Flex and Nano Gen5, and the button-operated Nano X and Nano S Plus. The touchscreen models add a Transaction Check layer that screens a transaction through Blockaid before you sign — an extra warning, not a substitute for reading the screen. The Nano S Plus is the budget entry at €49 / $59, while the Stax tops the range at €399. All five work with the Ledger Wallet app (formerly Ledger Live).

Trezor’s line-up. Three current models, each also sold as a Bitcoin-only edition at the same price. The Safe 7 is the flagship at €249 with a colour touchscreen, Bluetooth, wireless charging and full iPhone signing; the Safe 5 adds a colour touchscreen at €129; the Safe 3 is the €59 entry with a monochrome screen and two buttons. On an iPhone, the Safe 3 and Safe 5 are limited to balances, buying and receiving — full phone signing needs the Safe 7. All three run Trezor Suite.

Coin support. Ledger supports 500+ coins natively in its app and thousands more through third-party wallets; Trezor supports thousands of coins and tokens through Trezor Suite. Both cover the majors — Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana across 100+ chains on Ledger’s side — but a specific token you hold may be supported on one and not the other, so check the asset list before you buy rather than after.

Which to pick. If you want the widest model range, a touchscreen option and the deepest native asset coverage in one app, Ledger is the stronger default. If open-source firmware and full phone signing on the flagship matter more than model variety, Trezor is the pick. Neither is meaningfully “safer” in the abstract; the deciding factors are the specific model’s screen and chip, and whether the software’s openness matters to you.

Ledger Models, Ranked

Five devices cover two jobs: the button-operated Nano S Plus and Nano X are compact backup signers, while the Stax, Flex and Nano Gen5 are touchscreen daily drivers. All five sign offline, run the same companion app and share the same core recovery flow; they differ in screen, connections and extras.

Ledger hardware wallet device
Ledger hardware wallet screen
Ledger hardware wallet with cable

ModelScreenConnectionsSecure ElementBatteryPrice
Stax3.7-inch curved E Ink touchscreenUSB-C, Bluetooth, NFC, QiCC EAL6+Up to 10h / 150 tx€399 / $399
Flex2.8-inch E Ink, Gorilla GlassUSB-C, Bluetooth, NFCCC EAL6+Up to 10h / 150 tx€249 / $249
Nano Gen52.8-inch monochrome E Ink touchscreenUSB-C, Bluetooth, NFCCC EAL6+Up to 10h / 150 tx€179 / $179
Nano X1.1-inch OLED, two buttonsUSB-C, BluetoothCC EAL5+Up to 5h€99 / $99
Nano S Plus1.1-inch OLED, two buttonsUSB-C onlyCC EAL6+None€49 / $59

Nano S Plus (€49 / $59). The cheapest entry: a battery-free, cable-only signer with a 1.1-inch OLED screen and two buttons. Long transactions are split across several screens, and it has no Transaction Check and no Recovery Key card, and cannot sign from an iPhone. It is a fine budget or backup signer, not a daily phone companion.

Nano X (€99 / $99). Adds Bluetooth and a battery rated up to five hours, so it pairs with iPhone and Android. It shares the small screen and missing extras with the S Plus, and it is the only current model on the lower CC EAL5+ chip rating.

Nano Gen5 (€179 / $179). The first touchscreen in the Nano line, launched October 2025, with a 2.8-inch monochrome E Ink screen, Bluetooth, NFC, Transaction Check and an included Recovery Key — cheaper than the Flex.

Flex (€249 / $249). A higher-resolution 2.8-inch grayscale E Ink screen behind Gorilla Glass in an aluminium frame, same connections as the Gen5, no wireless charging.

Stax (€399 / $399). The flagship: a 3.7-inch curved E Ink display in a credit-card-sized body with Qi wireless charging, built for owners who regularly review complex contract interactions and want more of each request visible at once.

Trezor Models, Ranked

Three models, each also sold as a Bitcoin-only edition at the same price. All three run open-source firmware in Trezor Suite and share the EAL6+ OPTIGA Trust M secure element; the Safe 7 adds a second chip and is the only one that fully signs from an iPhone.

Trezor hardware wallet device
Trezor hardware wallet confirmation screen
Trezor hardware wallet on desk

ModelScreenConnectionsSecure ElementBatteryiPhone signingPrice
Safe 72.5-inch colour touchscreenUSB-C, Bluetooth, Qi2OPTIGA Trust M + TROPIC01330 mAhFull€249 / $249
Safe 51.54-inch colour touchscreenUSB-COPTIGA Trust MNoneBalances / buy / receive only€129 / $129
Safe 30.96-inch monochrome OLED, two buttonsUSB-COPTIGA Trust MNoneBalances / buy / receive only€59 / $59

Safe 3 (€59 / $59). The entry model with a 0.96-inch monochrome OLED screen and two buttons. It uses the same secure element as the Safe 5 and ships with two 20-word backup cards. On an iPhone it only shows balances and receives or buys — signing needs a desktop or Android.

Safe 5 (€129 / $129). Released June 2024, adding a 1.54-inch colour touchscreen with haptic feedback behind Gorilla Glass 3 and a newer STM32U5 microcontroller that Trezor says the 2025 Safe 3 research did not affect. iPhone support is limited the same way as the Safe 3.

Safe 7 (€249 / $249). The October 2025 flagship: a 2.5-inch colour touchscreen, aluminium body with IP54 protection, Bluetooth, Qi2 wireless charging and full iPhone signing. It pairs the OPTIGA chip with TROPIC01, a second secure element Trezor markets as auditable and designed to receive quantum-secure updates. It costs more than four times the Safe 3.

Security, Recovery and the Track Record

A hardware wallet is only as good as the key-management story around it, and the two brands have taken different paths here. Ledger launched an optional paid recovery service, Ledger Recover, that backs up an encrypted version of the seed phrase across three custodians; it is opt-in and off by default, but it is the single biggest point of debate about the brand, because it introduces a cloud dependency into a product sold on the premise of keeping keys offline. Trezor’s answer has been Multi-share Backup on the newer models, which splits the recovery data into multiple shares held separately, plus a Keep Metal plate for fire-proof physical backup.

Both companies have security histories worth reading rather than hand-waving away. Trezor’s older Safe 3 design was the subject of a March 2025 research disclosure from Ledger’s own Donjon security lab, and Trezor has disclosed past research findings and a support-portal data breach; Ledger has published numbered security bulletins over the years — including an August 2026 Ethereum app flaw it fixed in version 1.22.3 — and its 2020 e-commerce data breach is part of the public record. In every case the device security model held — the leaks were marketing databases, portals and app code, not extracted keys — which is exactly what a hardware wallet is built to survive. The lesson is the same as with any self-custody: a hardware wallet protects your keys from malware, not your name and address from a breached mailing list.

Recovery is the part most people get wrong. If you lose the device, the seed phrase restores everything on a new wallet from either brand or any BIP39-compatible alternative. If you lose the phrase, the device alone cannot help you. Write the phrase down, never store it digitally, never photograph it, and treat anyone asking for it — by email, DM or a fake support page — as a thief by definition. No legitimate wallet company will ever ask you for your seed phrase.

How We Rate Crypto Wallets

Every rating on this page is a weighted composite our team scores against the same wallet-specific rubric. We test the hardware and its companion app hands-on and re-check the figures with each update of this list.

Security (30%). The secure element’s certification level, how the device handles confirmations on-screen, firmware openness, and the quality and history of the vendor’s security disclosures. This is the heaviest weight because it is the entire reason the product exists.

Coin and asset support (25%). How many chains and tokens the device signs for natively and through its companion app, and whether a mainstream asset you actually hold is covered.

Ease of use and setup (20%). How clearly the seed phrase flow, first transaction and recovery are guided, and whether the app works the same across desktop and mobile.

Product range and ecosystem (15%). The spread of models and price points, the quality of the companion app, and whether the maker has a credible roadmap for firmware updates.

Price and value (10%). What the entry price buys you relative to the cheapest software-wallet and exchange alternatives, and whether premium models justify their premium.

Ledger’s 8.8 rests on the widest model range and the deepest native asset coverage, held back only by the partially closed firmware; Trezor’s 8.6 reflects open-source firmware and a clean three-model line-up, held back by a narrower model spread and limited iPhone support on its cheaper models. Two brands can land within a few tenths of each other and suit completely different buyers.

Two things never move a score. Commercial terms between a brand and this publication have no bearing on its rating, and any claim we cannot attribute to a verifiable source — the maker’s own comparison page, its security bulletins, or public reporting — stays out entirely. Where a fact is missing, we describe the situation in words rather than filling the gap with a number.

Before You Buy

Buy only from the maker’s official shop or a listed authorised reseller, and check the tamper-evident seal and the device’s initial firmware state when it arrives — a “pre-configured” wallet with a pre-written seed phrase is a scam by definition. Start with a small test transfer before moving a meaningful balance, keep firmware updated, and store the seed phrase somewhere that survives both a house fire and a casual glance. Prices and model line-ups change, so treat the maker’s shop as the current source of truth before ordering.

Hardware wallets reduce risk; they do not eliminate it. A device can be lost, a seed phrase can be destroyed, and a user who approves a transaction without reading the screen can still send funds to an attacker. Self-custody means the responsibility — and the full benefit — of controlling your keys is yours.

This page is editorial information, not financial, legal or investment advice. We cover the wallets and their security models, not the coins they store. Verify current specifications, prices and availability with the maker before you purchase, and never share your seed phrase with anyone.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need a hardware wallet, or is a mobile wallet enough?

It depends on the amount, not on how experienced you are. A mobile or extension wallet is reasonable for a spending float you could afford to lose to a compromised phone; anything above that belongs on a device that signs offline. Trezor starts From $49 and Ledger From $79, which is a one-off cost against a permanent reduction in exposure.

Are crypto wallets free?

The software usually is. Phantom, Exodus, Trust Wallet and MetaMask are all Free to download and use. What you pay is the network fee on every outgoing transaction, which goes to the blockchain rather than the developer, plus the spread built into in-app swaps and fiat purchases, and the purchase price of a hardware device if you use one.

What is the difference between a custodial and a non-custodial wallet?

In a non-custodial wallet the keys are generated on your device and only you can sign transactions; every wallet in our test set is Self-custody (non-custodial). A custodial service, such as an exchange account, holds the keys for you and can restrict, freeze or close the account. Custody means someone else can help you recover access, and also that someone else can deny it.

Can I use the same recovery phrase for Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana?

Usually yes. One recovery phrase derives a separate branch of keys for each supported chain, which is why a multi-chain wallet can restore several ecosystems from the same words. Coverage still varies by product, so check the wallet's stated networks before you rely on it for a specific asset.

What happens if the wallet company shuts down?

With a self-custody wallet your funds are unaffected, because they exist on the blockchain and the keys are derived from your recovery phrase. You import that phrase into another compatible wallet and continue. This is only true if you actually hold the phrase, which is one more reason to test a restore before funding a wallet.

Is it safe to store my recovery phrase in a password manager or cloud drive?

No. Any copy that exists in a file on an internet-connected device or a cloud account is exposed to breaches, syncing and malware, and photos of a phrase upload automatically on most phones. Write it by hand, or stamp it into metal for larger amounts, and store it physically. No legitimate developer or support agent will ever ask you for it.