The internet’s once purposeful avoidance of a single controlling entity helped it succeed in no small part. This approach enabled its rapid and widespread adoption because internetworking did not require networks to grant control or permission to another entity, thereby fulfilling various requirements and positioning the World Wide Web as a public good. It also reflected efforts to keep a single technical failure from having a disproportionate impact.
Centralization became a fact with Web 2.0, and avoiding it has proven difficult since then. Many online applications and protocols operate in a centralized manner. However, centralization runs contrary to the very nature of the internet. It is often described as a “network of networks” because it is a vast and heterogeneous collection of interconnected systems. These networks agree to facilitate communication instead of being subservient to others’ requirements.
The emphasis on action independence is reflected in network design and architecture, like the concept of an autonomous system. Blockchain technology has enabled the creation of decentralized networks consisting of nodes that receive, store, and transmit data. There is no centralized server and, consequently, no single point of failure. If one node goes down, the network can continue operating.
Network power is proportional to the number of participants
A distributed network makes sure that data relies on multiple sources, none of which is centrally governed. Anyone can join and contribute to such networks. The more nodes there are in a network, the more powerful it tends to become. The technology shows considerable promise for achieving decentralization. Datagram, a platform for high-performance applications that enables fast and scalable connectivity, has launched its Alpha Testnet, allowing users to operate and validate a verifiable coordination layer for the interoperability of Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks, or DePINs. The testnet enables participants to operate nodes, earn rewards for referrals and uptime, and enhance network performance.
Datagram’s infrastructure addresses mounting concerns around internet centralization and vulnerability. Many services rely on non-transparent networks, proprietary clouds, vendor-controlled APIs, etc. Datagram makes it possible to host, route, validate, and score workloads across fragmented DePIN networks with proof-based coordination. The testnet focuses on measurable contribution, transparency, and minimal dependence on central mediators to support the verifiable infrastructure layer.
Anyone can operate a Datagram node even without blockchain expertise. Participants install nodes that automatically check availability and report status four times a day. They earn airdrop points for each successful check-in, which convert into $DGRAM tokens during the TGE taking place in the third quarter of 2025. Top contributors are eligible for additional hardware rewards.
Decentralization addresses scarcity and encourages competition
If there were just one provider of a service or function in a jurisdiction or region, that function or service would be centralized for the users there, or so one would assume. However, it’s now possible to decentralize a service that is only available through a limited number of providers or even just a single one. DePINs enable individuals and small operators to contribute hardware resources, such as computing, storage, wireless connectivity, or sensors. They distribute the physical layer of the internet across a wide network of participants.
Token incentives, modular architecture, and reputation systems can coordinate and scale reliable contributions from a diverse pool of operators if the function requires specialized equipment or expertise. One can decentralize services that were once impeded by high costs or limited access, reducing single points of failure and enhancing infrastructure resilience and openness.
Internet users benefit from robust competition, particularly when they can develop their own applications and services according to interoperable standards. When services or functions become dependent on a centralized platform because there are no substitutes, they become essential facilities, inevitably leading to abuse of power. Internet applications and services improve when there are multiple ways to obtain access to them. Centralized services may benefit from the attention required by their elevated role, but if they fail, the impact of losing availability can be disproportionate.
A centralized service’s access to information allows it to improve its offerings, but the service denies others such access. Decoupling data storage from services will restore users’ control of their data, according to Sir Timothy John Berners-Lee, who invented the internet. This means people can use any services they want and also store their data wherever they choose.
The internet has departed from its conceptual origins: Google Search, Amazon Web Services, and Meta’s social networks are all pertinent examples. Decentralization intends to break that monopoly. Distributed networks can guarantee that no single entity controls information flow, as opposed to a single server hosting all data.
The obstacle-ridden road to trustless infrastructure
Network effects causing centralization can also deliver benefits, such as improvements in latency, resilience, and efficiency. The optimal degree of decentralization for a function varies depending on specific circumstances. One can mitigate the risks associated with a necessarily centralized function by delegating its execution to multiple stakeholders, thereby facilitating well-thought-out and broadly agreed-upon decisions. Blockchains distribute mediation and other potentially centralized tasks to members of a vast pool of protocol participants. A transaction ledger or another cryptographic technique typically guarantees the proper performance of a function.
Among the shortcomings of distributed consensus protocols is the diffused responsibility for an operation among several parties, which can be difficult to identify. This can effectively prevent some types of centralization, but it also becomes impossible to hold someone accountable for the performance of a function. Services in decentralized ecosystems can incorporate third-party SDKs, privileged operations, and other centralized elements or scenarios, which run contrary to the principle of decentralization and may result in security risks.
The risks of persisting centralization should in no way be downplayed. They include but aren’t limited to arbitrary rule changes by authorities, counterfeits, security vulnerabilities, account freezes, and human error with disastrous consequences. The shift to a decentralized internet aims to create a more transparent, private, and secure online experience for all users.
